Self-Complexity and Organization
Future book purchase 1: At Home In the Universe
Description
"A major scientific revolution has begun, a new paradigm that rivals Darwin's theory in importance. At its heart is the discovery of the order that lies deep within the most complex of systems, from the origin of life, to the workings of giant corporations, to the rise and fall of great civilizations. And more than anyone else, this revolution is the work of one man, Stuart Kauffman, a MacArthur Fellow and visionary pioneer of the new science of complexity. Now, in At Home in the Universe, Kauffman brilliantly weaves together the excitement of intellectual discovery and a fertile mix of insights to give the general reader a fascinating look at this new science--and at the forces for order that lie at the edge of chaos.This book touches on a lot of the issues that Taneem and I have been discussing last term. Its quite remarkable how reality has evolved. It makes one think if organization and complexity are simply non-existant and just that our 'brains' are hardwired to perceive these ideas at a highly conceptual level; or if they are intrinsic to the properities of the universe. I like using ";" if you haven't noticed.
This leads on to another book that I had actually been searching for because I saw it on television a while back as a reinvention of science. Yet all my searches failed (i.e. I got distracted by other results on google). That is, until I spent 3 hours at Chapters just book-browsing and happened up on it. yay!
Future book purchase 2: A New Kind of Science
(Stephen Wolfram's website)
This book is actually available online; however its only 50 odd bucks for a 1000+ page book. And I do not intend to read a 1000+ page technically advanced book on my laptop.
These headings are directly from the website (yay copy-paste), but click here to view additional description of these points.
- Mathematical equations do not capture many of nature’s most essential mechanisms
- Thinking in terms of programs rather than equations opens up a new kind of science
- Even extremely simple programs can produce behavior of immense complexity
- Simple programs can yield behavior startlingly like what we see in nature
- Simple programs can do much more than typical programs written by programmers
- Simple computer experiments reveal a vast world of new phenomena
- Randomness in physics can be explained by mechanisms of simple programs
- Thermodynamic behavior can be explained by mechanisms of simple programs
- Complexity in biology can be explained by mechanisms of simple programs
- Simple programs may lay the groundwork for new insights about financial systems
- Our whole universe may be governed by a single underlying simple program
- Underlying space there may be a simple discrete structure
- Time may have a fundamentally different nature from space
- Systems with exceptionally simple rules can be universal computers
- Many systems in nature are capable of universal computation
- The Principle of Computational Equivalence provides a broad synthesis
- Many systems in nature are computationally equivalent to us as humans
- Many systems in nature can show features like intelligence
- Extraterrestrial intelligence is inevitably difficult to define and recognize
- It is easy to make randomness that we cannot decode
- Apparent complexity in nature follows from computational equivalence
- Many important phenomena are computationally irreducible
- Apparent free will can arise from computational irreducibility
(this point is also argued in the book Freedom Evolves - fahd) - Undecidability occurs in natural science, not just mathematics
- The difficulty of doing mathematics reflects computational irreducibility
- Existing mathematics covers only a tiny fraction of all possibilities
- Studying simple programs can form a basis for technical education
- Mechanisms from simple programs suggest new kinds of technology
What's interesting about this book is that Wolfram has apparently reinterpeted classical mathematical representation of science into a programmatic form. I definately agree with his postulate that Mathematics is limited and not necessarily the best way to represent reality. It is possibly because programs function into time and its easy to get very complex actions with a very simply program.
Anyways; I have a ton of books to finish AND study for my 2B term's course material. So most likely I'll get these books as a new year's gift to myself for the winter co-op term.
1 Comments:
I'm quite happy (now, but not during the term) at being at University of Waterloo. We actually have the Perimeter Theoretical Institute of Physics 5 min from campus; which I'm sure has people researching complexity and organization. I don't know how much they would allow an undergrad to get involved, but they do have great lectures about cutting edge research.
I've stopped caring much for grammar ever since entering Engineering and the increasing use of instant messaging and message boards/blogs. I'm quite sure that I and others have invented their own english grammar, unknowlingly, by just following what was natural to their writing style. That would make an interesting research, which could turn into a book, which people would buy and someone would make tons of money off of. Pointless things have a way of making money.
I think its amazing that the internet, though global, has been able to create its own common lingo without any central organization enforcing it, such as: ":)" and also "lol". They are quite useful for socializing and i know people that have actually said out loud "elle oh elle" because they are so used to reacting that way to a joke when chatting to friends.
Post a Comment
<< Home